Newsletter Subscribe
Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter
Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter
The United States is facing a fiscal reality without historical precedent. Federal debt has exceeded $38 trillion, interest expenses are approaching $1 trillion annually, and—quietly but critically—interest payments now exceed defense spending.
Markets continue to debate whether the U.S. will “default.” This framing is fundamentally flawed. The real risk is not non-payment, but payment in devalued money. The United States will honor its obligations nominally. The loss will occur in purchasing power, not in accounting terms.
This article explains why a formal default is almost impossible, how soft default operates in practice, and why the next decade is likely to be defined by financial repression, negative real rates, and a structural transfer of wealth from savers to asset holders.

Headlines focus on the size of U.S. debt. Professionals focus on interest expense relative to fiscal capacity.
| Metric (FY 2025 est.) | Amount |
|---|---|
| Total Federal Debt | ~$38.4 trillion |
| Net Interest Expense | ~$970 billion |
| Defense Spending | ~$850 billion |
| Medicare Spending | ~$950 billion |
For the first time in modern U.S. history, interest is one of the largest line items in the federal budget. This marks a structural break.
Debt sustainability is not about whether a country can repay principal. It is about whether it can service interest without destabilizing the system. On this dimension, the margin for error has vanished.
There are three textbook responses to sovereign debt overload:
The first two are effectively unavailable.
Social Security, Medicare, defense, and interest payments account for the majority of federal outlays. These are politically rigid commitments, not discretionary expenses. Any serious attempt to cut them would be electorally fatal and economically destabilizing.
U.S. Treasuries are the foundation of:
A formal default would trigger a global financial seizure. For the issuer of the world’s reserve currency, this option is not merely unattractive—it is existential.
That leaves only one path.
A soft default occurs when a government honors all obligations in nominal terms while systematically reducing the real value of those payments.
Just purchasing power quietly leaking away.
This mechanism has historical precedent:
The strategy works when nominal interest rates are kept below the true inflation rate for extended periods.
For decades, the Federal Reserve operated under monetary dominance—inflation control came first, regardless of fiscal discomfort.
That regime is over.
At current debt levels, every additional percentage point in interest rates adds hundreds of billions of dollars to annual federal interest expense. Sustained “Volcker-style” policy is mathematically incompatible with fiscal solvency.
This condition is known as fiscal dominance:
Monetary policy becomes constrained by the government’s ability to service debt.
The Federal Reserve is no longer fully independent in practice. Its policy choices are bounded by the Treasury’s balance sheet.
Soft default does not require conspiracy. It relies on institutional design.
Banks, insurers, and pension funds are required by regulation to hold “high-quality liquid assets.” U.S. Treasuries define that category.
This creates structural, non-economic demand for government debt, regardless of yield.
Modern CPI methodology incorporates:
These techniques are defensible statistically, but they systematically understate lived inflation, particularly in housing, healthcare, insurance, and education.
The result is a persistent gap between official inflation and experienced inflation—the space where real wealth erosion occurs.
When private demand weakens, the central bank becomes the buyer of last resort through:
At that point, price discovery in sovereign debt markets effectively ceases.
New money does not enter the economy evenly.
Those closest to the issuance point—financial institutions and asset owners—receive purchasing power before prices adjust. Wage earners receive it after.
This produces the now-familiar K-shaped outcome:
| Group | Effect of Monetary Expansion |
|---|---|
| Asset Owners | Asset price inflation |
| Wage Earners | Cost-of-living pressure |
| Savers | Real wealth erosion |
This is not a policy failure. It is a structural feature of the system.
The classic stock-bond diversification model assumes:
Under fiscal dominance, bonds become a transmission mechanism for soft default, not a hedge. When inflation risk rises, both stocks and bonds can fall simultaneously.
The 2022 drawdown was not an anomaly. It was a regime signal.
Ignore speeches. Watch constraints.
As long as interest costs continue to crowd out discretionary spending, financial repression remains inevitable.
If nominal yields consistently trail experienced inflation, the system is actively taxing savers.
This inversion indicates liquidity dominance over fundamentals—a hallmark of late-cycle monetary regimes.
This is not a call for speculation. It is a call for structural adaptation.
Assets that historically preserve value under financial repression share common traits:
These include:
The strategic shift is away from nominal safety and toward real resilience.
The United States is not heading toward default in the traditional sense. It is executing a controlled repricing of obligations through time.
This path is quieter, slower, and politically survivable. It is also profoundly redistributive.
The critical question for individuals and institutions is not whether the system will honor contracts—but what those contracts will be worth when honored.
In that distinction lies the defining investment challenge of the coming decade.